![]() |
| Ooo....aaahh... |
- Over 3000 cubic inches, plus ability to strap/attach bulky items like sleeping bags or large stuff sacks to the exterior. You can go smaller, but it becomes very hard to pack 3 days worth of food, shelter, etc.
- Sturdy construction - not overly thin or rip-prone materials.
- Good suspension - aluminum stays, good shoulder straps and waist belts. It doesn't need to be able to haul 100 pounds comfortably, but does need to be able to haul 30-45 pounds without discomfort.
- Suspension should be adjustable to get a good fit.
- Some level of additional organization/pockets or ability to add 'em
- Subdued color scheme, but not a straight out of the military look
This pack hits all of those criteria, for under $60. There are other solid choices to be sure--the ALICE pack being a classic choice--but I wanted to go a different route for this series. The Scout 3400 has really impressed me in terms of value for the dollar.
The tale of the tape and full rundown are after the jump, plus tips for the many who have a pack they're happy with.
The tale of the tape and full rundown are after the jump, plus tips for the many who have a pack they're happy with.
![]() |
| The Scout 3400's suspension is very adjustable, and also completely removable. |
- Top-loader design with storm collar
- 3400 cubic inches
- 4.5 pounds pack weight
- Internal frame, with aluminum stays.
- Adjustable suspension -- if you're over 6 foot, you may not be able to get enough height out of the suspension. I'm 5'11 and it's borderline.
- Removable shoulder straps and waist belt -- potential for an upgrade down the road
- Built in rain cover/fly, though it's in bright yellow.
- Tons of additional external attachment points--sleeping bag/sleeping pad straps, two bungie areas (top of pack and face of pack), front mesh pocket, wand pockets on either side, ice axe loops, and two elastic webbing loops on either side, plus storage space under the top-loader lid.
- Hydration sleeve
- Separate sleeping bag compartment, though it will only fit a light weight/backpacking size bag.
- Nalgene-sized zip pockets on either side
- Zip pockets on the outside and inside of the lid
Yep, that's a ton of features. It actually blows away the older REI Lookout packs we've had for a while, in every dimension except for materials and craftsmanship. The Scout 3400 is a good quality, tough feeling pack, but it's a bit rough around the edges. It's all off brand materials--hardware, nylon, webbing--they're not on the same level as you'll find with a more expensive pack. The zippers, for example, are sturdy but a bit tough to close. It's not as "nice" as a pack three or four times its price, but it works.
If you're into serious backpacking, you'll probably want something a bit nicer, but if the bag is going to serve closet-duty with the occasional camping trip thrown in, the Scout 3400 should serve well. For a budget bug out bag, the Scout is a great pack for the money. I'll be interested to see how it stacks up against the spendy Kifaru Longhunter I've got coming in the mail.
If you think you'll need more than 3400 cubic inches, Teton has a similar pack in 4000 cubic inches for a few bucks more. 3400 cubic inches is a decent size for a light-ish load for 3 days; with winter gear, it's more of an overnighter size.
Cost: $57.98 on Amazon.
Bank: $23.55 leftover from the past weeks, minus the $17.98 we went over budget this month, leaving us with $5.57.
A few more pictures of the pack's features below. Scroll to the end for "todos" if your pack is squared away.
![]() |
| Underneath the lid, the storm collar closes up tight. The lid is a good place to strap a bedroll or sleeping pad. |
![]() |
| The built in rainfly. |
![]() |
| A shot of the side of the pack - the zipper pockets will fit a Nalgene-sized bottle snugly. |
- Bust out the scale and start weighing things. Where can you shave off a few ounces?
- Check your zippers and buckles.
- Get some spare buckles--REI sells replacements, and there's always the internet. ITW Nexus is the best quality when it comes to plastic hardware. I lost my waistbelt's buckle on a hike once...that wasn't fun.
- Do you have a way to rain-proof you pack if needed? What if you needed to float it across a stream/river? Contractor weight garbage bags and drum liners can solve both of these problems.
- Get outside and get your pack on the trails!





How is the durability of the pack? I can't help but be extremely skeptical of a $60 pack.
ReplyDeleteI'm with you. I had my doubts, too. I haven't had the pack for for a long time, so I can comment on long term durability, but it seems pretty rugged--not the smoothest of materials, but tough enough. It's very well reviewed on Amazon, with no reports of failure that I've seen. Many of the pieces are replaceable were something to break, and the main compartment uses a drawstring instead of a zipper, which is often a point of failure on low-dollar packs.
DeleteI've had this pack for 2 years now. I've used it on too many hiking/ camping and back packing trips to count, and have been extremely impressed of how well the bag has stood up to abuse. I have a few frays around the elastic areas, and lost a few zipper pulls (easily replaced with paracord), but other than that the pack is still in great shape. As a side note, the side zippered pockets are a PERFECT fit for a holstered S&W M&P/ Sigma 9mm.
Delete@R Wall -
DeleteGood to hear you've got some hard use out of this pack! I figured it would hold up well.
For the Canadian readers of the blog... ;-)
ReplyDeleteWe've bought a few of those at Canadian Tire: http://www.canadiantire.ca/AST/browse/5/SportsRec/Camping/Backpacks/PRDOVR~0766029P/Ridgeway+by+Kelty+Backpack%2C+44+L.jsp?locale=en
It definitely isn't a hardcore backpacking / hiking model... But IMO it's worth the price they're asking for it.
It could've had better side pockets (and more external & internal pockets in general)... But otherwise - seems quite sturdy, has the aluminum spine, rain cover, various attachment options, adjustable suspension and waist belt, can be divided into bottom & top spaces (with separate access) or used as a single volume, hydration bladder pocket with drinking pipe opening in the external shell.
I took it for a test run with my full BOB content... Quite satisfactory.
All my rucksacks have a couple of heavy duty zip/cable ties left in the bottom after I broke a shoulder buckle on the trail. Not longterm but a good interim, get me home solution.
ReplyDeleteConsidering that I an 6' 4" do you have any recommendations as far as budget-minded packs go.
ReplyDeleteSorry meant am not an, blasted undersized laptop keyboard.
DeleteProbably the ol Alice pack.
DeleteNot nearly as light or has the same capacity as above, but if you need a 1800 ci capacity ruck that is tougher than hell and priced very competitively, the Swiss military canvas and leather models are worth a look. I have carried these over several years in the desert thorny scrub and they shrug this off like nothing. Nothing plastic on these, heavy duty canvas, leather and metal closures. Bonus - the outside pocket fits a pair of square U.S. quart canteens perfectly.
ReplyDeleteThey also sell 'bread bag' accessory bags that are designed to attach to flap closures. Great for a 'day bag' use while you stash the main pack, they have a light canvas strap that slings easily over the shoulder.
I hunt as much as I can (which is only a few days a year). Did you have any hunting packs as runner ups in this category? I figure if I get a hunting pack I can get it in camo and using hunting instead of prepping to explain the camo.
ReplyDeleteI didn't have any specific hunting packs in the running, but I would take a look at mil surplus stuff. Google up the "Hellcat" pack - a hybrid of ALICE and MOLLE packs.
DeleteAny pack like that would not last IMHO, once there is any kind of serious weight the stitching will fail, zippers will crap out. Amy surplus would be much stronger, or a pack made of 500 codura.
ReplyDeleteThe material is similar in weight to 500D - maybe a little bit thicker. The stitching, zippers,etc. are all fine - I doubt the pack would self destruct under a reasonable load.
DeleteLove this series! Its great to have someone of your caliber to show prepping newbies how easy it can be. Your work is appreciated.
ReplyDeleteI've had this pack as my BOB, now for over a year, and have used it on one three day hike. It's holding up extremely well, with no failures. The problem I've had with it, is, incredibly, the large amount of usable space. This can easily lead to overloading the bag because so much crap fits into it. The first time I loaded it, I thought the straps must be ready to tear out (they didn't) and it topped out at about 62 pounds! Through experimentation and learning, I dropped that to a 'normal' load of around 40 pounds. Most of the time, it rides in my truck, but I'm extremely happy with it.
ReplyDelete